Newsroom

News Release |

The 2025 Eyewear Raw Material Shortage: Strategic Solutions for Brands

Global eyewear brands and manufacturers are navigating one of the industry’s most turbulent periods. As a Wenzhou-based ODM/OEM eyewear factory with three decades of experience, we’re confronting the same raw material pressures impacting production floors worldwide. The numbers are stark: since early 2024, titanium alloy prices have surged by 18%, acetate sheet costs have climbed 22%, and specialized optical polymers face allocation limits. For brands relying on outsourced manufacturing, this translates to delayed orders, thinner margins, and frustrated customers. 

The Global Shortage: Causes and Immediate Impacts

Supply chain disruptions are not new, but the eyewear industry faces uniquely complex pressures:

  • Geopolitical and Logistical Strains: Lingering trade tensions and shipping delays continue to fragment access to key inputs like high-index lens monomers and specialized metal alloys. The titanium required for premium lightweight frames now faces lead times exceeding 90 days—double pre-2024 averages.
  • Concentrated Supplier Dependence: Critical coating chemicals and photochromic dyes rely on limited global sources. A single factory fire or regional conflict can paralyze multiple production lines overnight.
  • Demand-Supply Mismatch: The surge in optical and blue-light-filtering eyewear post-pandemic hasn’t been matched by investments in base material capacity. Acetate sheet suppliers, for example, report operating at 95% utilization with no new factories coming online before 2026.

For eyewear brands, these pressures manifest as extended lead times (averaging 120–150 days for new orders), cost

inflation (15–30% price hikes on metal and acetate frames), and MOQ challenges—especially for complex designs requiring specialized materials.

 

How the Shortage Impacts Your Eyewear ODM/OEM Projects

Prototyping Delays and Design Limitations

Securing sample quantities of specialty materials (e.g., memory titanium, biobased acetates) now takes 3–4 weeks—twice as long as in 2023. This bottlenecks new product development and forces brands to compromise on designs or switch to less ideal, but available, alternatives.

Rising Costs and Minimum Order Pressures

With acetate prices up 22% and titanium up 18% year-on-year, factories face brutal margin compression. To offset this, many suppliers enforce stricter MOQ requirements:

Standard metal frames: 1,000–2,000 units

Complex acetate designs: 2,000–3,000+ units

Sustainable/biobased materials: 5,000+ units

Smaller brands risk being priced out or forced into overstock situations.

Quality Consistency Threats

Desperate for alternatives, some manufacturers use non-vetted secondary suppliers. This introduces risks:

Substandard metal alloys leading to frame fractures

Inconsistent acetate coloration

Lens coatings with poor adhesion or optical clarity

 

How Forward-Thinking Factories Are Responding

Strategy 1: Vertical Integration and In-House Material Development

Leading Chinese manufacturers are investing backward into core materials:

  • Example: Oupul Kangshi now produces 100% of its hard lens monomers internally, ensuring uninterrupted supply despite external shortages. Though not yet selling externally, this self-sufficiency shields their production from market volatility.

Strategy 2: Agile Sourcing Networks

We’ve mitigated acetate shortages by qualifying regional suppliers (Japan, Italy, Taiwan) for each material grade. This avoids single-source dependency and provides negotiating leverage on pricing. Key steps include:

  • Digitally mapping tier-2 and tier-3 raw material suppliers
  • Pre-qualifying backups using strict testing protocols
  • Pooling procurement with non-competing factories for bulk discounts

Strategy 3: ERP-Driven Efficiency and Waste Reduction

Real-time material tracking systems (like Wanda Bao’s Eyewear Manufacturing ERP) slash waste by 18–25%—effectively stretching scarce resources. These systems:

  • Automatically adjust cutting patterns to minimize acetate/Ti scrap
  • Predict material needs using AI to avoid overordering
  • Flag quality deviations before they consume excess raw stock

Table: Impact of ERP Systems on Eyewear Production Efficiency

Metric

Before ERP Implementation After ERP Implementation Improvement

Material Waste Rate

12.8% 9.1%

↓ 29%

On-Time Order Delivery

73% 95%

↑ 30%

Inventory Turnover 4.2x/year 5.7x/year

↑ 35%

Strategy 4: Sustainable and Alternative Materials

Wenzhou’s R&D push includes marine-based polymers (from recycled fishing nets) and plant-derived acetates—less impacted by petrochemical shortages. Early adopters gain triple benefits:

  • Diversified sourcing options
  • Appealing sustainability storytelling
  • Eligibility for eco-conscious EU/US markets

 

Case Study: Wenzhou’s Blueprint for Resilience

As the “Eyewear Capital of China,” Wenzhou (home to our factory) exemplifies regional adaptation:

Tech-Driven Production: Our new AI-powered smart glasses line (developed with Ruiche Technology) uses 37% less titanium via precision laser cutting and AI-optimized designs—without sacrificing strength.

Industry-Academia Collaboration: Partnerships with institutions like Wenzhou Medical University accelerate material innovation. The “Advanced Optics and Eye Health Integration Center” focuses on lens materials using abundant silica and biopolymers.

Government-Backed Upgrading: Policies like the Wenzhou District Promotion of Eyewear Industry High-Quality Development Action Plan (2024–2026) fund:

Factory 4.0 automation transitions

Sustainable material R&D tax credits

Cross-border e-commerce hubs to bypass traditional logistics choke points

 

Looking Ahead: The Future of Eyewear Sourcing

Material innovation will accelerate—especially in bio-acetates, recycled titanium, and self-tinting lenses using organic dyes. Factories ignoring this shift risk obsolescence.

Regionalized supply chains will dominate. Brands working with Vietnamese, Indian, or Mexican factories must still source specialty materials from established clusters like Wenzhou or Dongguan.

Direct partnerships between brands and material innovators will rise. Forward-looking brands (like those we support) co-develop exclusive materials with factories—securing supply while differentiating collections.

 

Partner with a Factory Built for Uncertainty

Raw material volatility won’t end in 2025. What separates resilient suppliers is how they adapt.

As a Wenzhou ODM/OEM specialist, we’ve engineered stability through:
✅ Multi-continent sourcing networks for acetates, metals, and coatings
✅ ERP-optimized production minimizing waste and maximizing yield
✅ R&D partnerships developing abundant alternative materials
✅ MOQ flexibility via shared material pools across client projects

Let’s future-proof your next collection. Contact our material specialists for a shortage-resistant sourcing plan—including sustainable material options and MOQ-optimized designs.

 

FAQs: Eyewear Raw Material Shortages

What’s causing the 2025 eyewear raw material shortage?

A convergence of factors: supply chain disruptions for titanium and acetates, factory energy constraints in Europe, rising optical lens monomer demand exceeding supply, and logistical delays in key shipping lanes.

How are minimum order quantities (MOQs) being affected?

MOQs have risen 20–40% for styles needing titanium, specialty acetates, or advanced lens coatings. Factories require larger orders to offset procurement costs and material waste.

What strategies help mitigate shortage risks?

Diversify sourcing beyond single regions.

Adopt ERP systems to cut waste by up to 25%.

Use alternative materials (e.g., bio-acetates, recycled metals).

Pool orders with non-competing brands to meet higher MOQs.

Are sustainable materials more available?

Often yes. Bio-based acetates (from cotton or wood pulp) and recycled metals face less competition than petroleum-based plastics and can be sourced faster.

Why choose a Chinese ODM/OEM partner during shortages?

Chinese factories benefit from:

Regional industrial clusters (e.g., Wenzhou’s integrated eyewear supply chain).

Government R&D backing for material innovation.

Advanced production tech reducing per-unit material needs.

How will smart glasses impact material demand?

They’re driving need for aerospace-grade titanium (lightweight strength) and optical-grade polymers (for embedded electronics). Factories with existing access to these materials hold an advantage.